Pharmacological Management of Tardive Dyskinesia
Vernon M Neppe MD, PhD
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES:
- To provide background as to the enormity of the problem of.
- To discuss the pharmacologic management of tardive dyskinesia.
-
To allow perspectives as to alternative mechanisms of action of drugs
such as masking and subsensitization.
-
Give perspectives for practice on the prevention and the treatment
of this condition.
Abstract
Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) has become the single major epidemiological
scourge in the psychopharmacotherapy of the psychotic patient. The
threat of development of abnormal, largely irreversible, involuntary
movements associated with chronic administration of antipsychotic drugs,
has created debates as to whether, at times, continued antipsychotic
drug treatment is appropriate and has substantially changed the
management of psychoses.
Measures of TD are largely inadequate leading to the development by
the author of the STRAW system of evaluation.
There are no FDA approved drugs for Tardive Dyskinesia.
Numerous medications have been attempted for the management of this
syndrome, with little success. Previously investigated pharmacologic
interventions have included cholinergic agents, amine synthesis
inhibitors, amine-depleting agents, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)
agonists, calcium antagonists and vitamin E. Most of these agents
produced inconsistent or temporary effects or were associated with
unacceptable side effects.
Numerous medications accentuate this condition including
anticholinergics and neuroleptic withdrawal. Additionally, stress and
serotonin modulating drugs influence outcome.
Because TD has been linked to dopamine receptor supersensitivity,
and associated tardive psychosis may have similar mechanisms, drugs
which may stabilize, this supersensitivity appear appropriate
theoretical choices for use in TD. Consequently, the availability of
the azapirone, buspirone, may be a breakthrough of profound
significance. This drug seems theoretically and empirically to
alleviate TD in doses of 120-240 mg/day. The evidence for this is
discussed based on the authorâs research both in Washington state
and St Louis. The need for double blind studies is emphasized.
|